These standards apply to every section of Alex Morgan Unfiltered — Finance, Tech, Current Affairs, US, Australia, Asia, Travel, Geopolitics, Economy, and any topic we add later.
What we cover
We publish fact-checked analysis and explainers across public affairs, markets, technology, travel, and regional news. The same standards apply whether a story is about policy, prices, products, places, or people in the news.
Accuracy
We aim to get the record right: names, dates, figures, locations, product details, legal or regulatory status, and what officials, companies, or institutions actually said. Where numbers are estimates, forecasts, polls, or modelled outcomes, we label them as such.
Sourcing
Wherever practical, articles link to or name underlying sources — official data, primary documents, company or government statements, reputable reporting, and recognised statistical agencies. We prefer primary sources over secondary summaries when both are available.
How we present sources
Sources sit in a separate pane at the end of the article — visually distinct from the narrative — so readers can verify claims without breaking the reading flow.
Placement — end of article only, after the analysis.
Order — organisation name first, then document or article title, then date when it helps.
Preference — primary sources (official data, minutes, statutes, company filings) ahead of secondary reporting when both exist.
Links — include a stable public URL when available.
Editorial notes — optional caveats (market pricing vs official forecasts, incomplete data, scope limits) go in a quieter sibling pane, not mixed into the source list.
Fact, analysis, and opinion
Fact — what can be verified from the record.
Analysis — interpretation of those facts, framed as explanation rather than a confirmed outcome.
Opinion — if used, it will be labelled. Most of what appears here is commentary and explainers, not partisan promotion or undisclosed sponsorship.
Claims, announcements, and what is already in effect
Many stories mix proposals, threats, trials, roadmaps, and measures already in force. Across all topics — from policy and markets to technology launches and travel rules — we try to keep those stages distinct so readers are not left thinking a plan, rumour, or announcement is already settled reality.
Context without hype
We aim for clear language and proportionate framing. Dramatic headlines or social buzz do not replace verification. When evidence is incomplete, contested, or changing quickly, we say so.
Corrections
When we identify a significant error of fact, we correct the article and note the change when the correction materially affects understanding. Minor typos may be fixed quietly.
To request a correction, use the Contact page and include the article URL, the passage in question, and your suggested correction with a source if available.
Conflicts and independence
We do not accept payment for favourable coverage. Sponsored, affiliate, or partner content, if ever published, will be clearly labelled.